Funding Priorities

The goal of the Greater Baltimore HIV Health Services Planning Council is to fund the services that people living with HIV/AIDS need the most.

Learn more about:


For details on the federal Ryan White program, read about HRSA's HIV/AIDS Program Legislation.

To view a history of Part A allocations and expenditures for the Baltimore EMA and all EMAs across the country, see HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau's Grantee Allocation and Expenditure Reports.

View FY 2011's priorities and funding allocations:
View FY 2010's priorities and funding allocations:
  • FY 2010 EMA Allocations (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase.
  • FY 2010 Counties Allocations (funds allocated for services within the six suburban counties of the EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase.

View FY 2010's Ryan White Part A and MAI programs, by service category:
View FY 2009's priorities and funding allocations:
  • FY 2009 EMA Allocations (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase.
  • FY 2009 Counties Allocations (funds allocated for services within the six suburban counties of the EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase.

View FY 2008's Ryan White Part A and MAI programs, by service category:
View FY 2008's priorities and funding allocations:
  • FY 2008 EMA Allocations (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase
  • FY 2008 Counties Allocations (funds allocated for services within the six suburban counties of the EMA). This document shows funding allocations under two funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss and (b) level funding or a funding increase.

View FY 2007's priorities and funding allocations:
  • FY 2007 EMA Allocations, revised (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA). This document shows funding allocations under three funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss of 0.01 percent through 10.00 percent, (b) a funding loss of 10.01 percent through infinity, and (c) a funding increase of 0.00 percent and up through infinity.
  • FY 2007 Counties Allocations, revised (funds allocated for services within the six suburban counties of the EMA). This document shows funding allocations under three funding contingencies: (a) a funding loss of 0.01 percent through 10.00 percent, (b) a funding loss of 10.01 percent through infinity, and (c) a funding increase of 0.00 percent and up through infinity.
  • FY 2007 MAI Allocations, final (funds allocated for services across the entire EMA).
  • FY 2007 MAI Counties Allocations, final (funds allocated for services within the six suburban counties of the EMA).

View FY 2006's priorities and funding allocations:
      IN THIS SECTION
»   Funding Priorities
º  Service Needs of PLWH/As
º  How Services are Funded
Home · Funding · Membership · Committee Descriptions · Meetings · Documents · Ryan White Program
Links · Contacts 
Copyright © 2010 InterGroup Services, Inc. All rights reserved.
To view most of our documents you'll need FREE Adobe Acrobat Reader.